A code assistant suggests; a person accepts, merges, and takes responsibility. That chain of accountability doesn't change because the person writing the draft changes, and it's best if it doesn't: it's the only way to guarantee that there's someone to ask when the system does something unexpected in production.<\/span><\/p>The problem arises when responsibility is implicitly diluted, without anyone explicitly deciding to do so. No one declares they are no longer accountable for their code. Simply put, the gap between those who accept it and those who understood it widens.<\/span><\/p>This confusion is costly because it consumes the budget and undermines the initiative's credibility. When, six months later, someone asks what has improved, the honest answer is usually "the initial experience," and that doesn't justify a transformation program.<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t